Newsletter

Newsletter Archive


2008 Archive

Trademark Law’s “Use in Commerce” Requirement - February/March 2008

2007 Archive

Secondary Liability for Trademark and Copyright Infringement - Year End 2007
Loosening the Standard for "Obviousness" October/November 2007
IP Managers and Patent Infringement Claims August/September 2007
Clearing the Way for "Pay and Sue" Lawsuits June/July 2007
Clarifying the Federal Trademark Dilution Act April/May 2007
Patent and Copyright Law's Sublicensing Rule February/March 2007

2006 Archive

Court Clarifies Written Description Requirement - Year End 2006
Supreme Court Denies Automatic Permanent Injunction - Oct/Nov 2006
Supreme Court Rejects Market Power Presumption August/September 2006
Y-Ike-s! Eisenhower’s War Memoir Ruled a Work-for-Hire June/July 2006
New Test for Trademark Fair Use April/May 2006
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act - February/March 2006

2005 Archive

The Supreme Courts Landmark Copyright Decision [Year End 2005]
Willfulness in Trademark False Designation Liability [Oct/Nov 2005]
Improved Versions and Abandonment of Original Inventions [Aug/Sept 2005]
Consumer Confusion and Trademarks Fair Use Defense [June/July 2005]
Art, Usefulness and Copyright Infringement [April/May 2005}
Adverse Inference and Exculpatory Opinion [February/March 2005]

2004 Archive

The Doctrine of Equivalents and Dependent Patent Claims [Dec 2004]
Trademark Law's Personal Name Rule [October/November 2004]
Pretrial Investigations [August/September 2004]
Internet Pop-ups and Trademark Rights [June/July 2004]
Generally parallel: A contradiction in terms? [April/May 2004]
Nothing to Sneeze At [February/March 2004]

2003 Archive

Changes to the Rules [Year-end 2003]
What's in a Name [October/November 2003]
Victor vs. Victoria [August/September 2003]
Profits Without Sales [June/July 2003]
Composition Patents [April/May 2003]
Registering Complaints [February/March 2003]

2002 Archive

Blinded by Precedent [Year-end 2002]
A Return to Reason [October/November 2002]
Know the Limits to Business Method Patents [August/September 2002]
Cybersqatters Can Run, But They Can't Hide [June/July 2002]
Buying Can Get You In as Much Trouble as Selling [April/May 2002]
States Generally Immune from Patent Infringement [Feb/March 2002]

CARR Intellectual Property attorneys serve clients throughout Texas, the United States, and the world. We counsel inventors and businesses in Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, Plano, Richardson, Frisco, Marshall and other cities in Texas. Our attorneys also serve many international clients, including companies in Hong Kong, Taiwan, United Kingdom, Canada, and Israel.

Carr LLP
670 Founders Square
900 Jackson Street
Dallas, TX 75202
Tel: 214.760.3000
Email


  • Save to favorites
  • Print page
  • Email page to a friend